feedzy-rss-feeds
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/bestlifeschedule/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121soledad
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/bestlifeschedule/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121Scott Lincicome<\/a>\n<\/p>\n In today\u2019s Wall Street Journal<\/em>, Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins revealed<\/a> the Trump administration\u2019s plan for lowering US egg prices, which have again spiked due to a large-scale outbreak of avian influenza. Buried among her proposals was a remarkable one (at least when coming from a Trump official): increasing egg imports to \u201creduce egg costs in the short term.\u201d In particular, the US government is in discussions<\/a> with three to four unspecified countries to import between 70 and 100 million eggs over the next few weeks to address the egg shortage and lower prices.<\/p>\n How interesting<\/em>.<\/p>\n In one sense, importing eggs to boost domestic supplies and temper prices is hardly revelatory. As Cato scholars have documented in recent years, imports and open markets have proven to be crucial tools for mitigating domestic supply shocks and keeping prices in check. And this lesson holds for eggs too: during past<\/a> avian flu outbreaks when US egg supplies faltered, private parties turned to imports, which\u2014aided by relatively limited government restrictions thereon\u2014helped fill the gap.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n