feedzy-rss-feeds
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/bestlifeschedule/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121soledad
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/bestlifeschedule/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121David J. Bier<\/a>\n<\/p>\n President Donald Trump is promising<\/a> to sell green cards \u201cwith a path to citizenship\u201d to one million or more immigrants who pay his administration a fee of $5 million. He plans to shut down the EB\u20115 immigrant visa category for investors and replace it with what he calls the \u201cTrump Gold Card.\u201d He has stated that he is not asking<\/a> Congress for legislation and plans to begin selling the cards in two weeks.<\/p>\n Selling green cards is good in theory, but Trump\u2019s specific proposal has some problems:<\/p>\n President Trump cannot lawfully eliminate Congress\u2019s EB\u20115 investor program.<\/p>\n Cato\u2019s Gold Card Idea<\/strong><\/p>\n Selling legal residence would be an improvement over the overly bureaucratic and restrictive legal system. My colleague Alex Nowrasteh published<\/a> a policy analysis explaining the value of the \u201cGold Card\u201d in 2019:<\/p>\n Congress should create an additional visa category that would allow foreigners to work and live legally in the United States after paying a tariff. Immigrants who pay the immigration tariff would receive a \u201cgold card\u201d that does not directly lead to citizenship but allows the immigrant to live and work legally in the United States\u2026. Removing the bureaucratic intermediaries, human smugglers, and immigration attorneys from the mix is certainly worth publicly abandoning the fantasy that money is an irrelevant consideration in immigrating to the United States.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n A gold card fee could be set at a level necessary to cover fiscal costs, to maximize revenue, or for any other purpose. Regardless of the intent, paying a fee to the government is much simpler than designing complicated rules about who qualifies for which visa category. While it would be better for the funds to go into the private sector, implementing a fee could help reduce the federal government\u2019s enormous deficit\u2014a challenge that Congress seems unwilling to reduce through a better mechanism, such as spending cuts.<\/p>\n The EB\u20115 Investor Program<\/strong><\/p>\n The current system offers immigrant investors the option to invest between $800,000 and $1.05 million. The process for obtaining an EB\u20115 green card is extremely<\/em> bureaucratic, as I explain in my paper on the legal immigration system<\/a>. To qualify under the $800,000 investment requirement, the project must be in a rural or high-unemployment area. Additionally, the government must believe that the job will create at least 10 full-time jobs for US workers within two years. It has an annual cap of 9,940 participants, but that includes spouses and minor children, so only about a third goes to investors.<\/p>\n There is a two-stage process for the EB\u20115. The investor must invest and submit a petition detailing how they expect to create 10 jobs. If approved, the investor receives a conditional green card. After two years, the investor must request that the conditions on the green card be removed if the 10 jobs are realized. As a result of its complicated rules, the EB\u20115 visa has shockingly high and unpredictable denial rates. Since 2007, more than one in five investors was rejected at the initial stage, and about one in ten were rejected at the second stage.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n